Based on over 20 years of execution and technology know-how in intralogistics and warehouse automation:

Expert opinion and evaluations for warehouse automation supplier/user conflicts
Warehouse automation is often complex. Automation projects therefore not always evolve as expected. The reasons can be manifold and frequently lead to conflicts and ambiguous topics.
Especially if there are different views in the domain of technology and solutions winkler-technology can provide added value:
- matter-of-fact approach
- senior expert opinion and evaluation
- constructive and resolution oriented
Looking for help? Let’s get in touch:

Patents /
Intellectual Property Rights
With the experience of
- over 30 own patents
- global responsibility for the IP organization of a top5 warehouse automation system supplier
winkler-technology provides comprehensive warehouse automation IPR insights.

Innovative Technology Solutions
Looking for some fresh, new angle to address a product or application design issue?
Hop over to the TECHNOLOGY page.

Advisory Council /
Board Membership
Expert advice at senior executive level. Deep technology know-how combined with 20 years intralogistics and leadership experience in:
- Quality Management
- Manufacturing
- Product Development (incl. Software & Controls)
- Solution Standardization
- Sales
- Product Management


Intellectual Property can be approached from different angles. Please read below about the specific services and value propositions.

Your own IP portfolio
You are unhappy with your patent portfolio?
The costs are clear, but where is the value?
Looking for support to grow and optimize your IP?

Foreign IP
Are you worried about some specific IP and need help?
Is there relevant prior-art?
Looking for an alternative, “safer” solution or design?

Strategy and Organization
Can I get ahead of the game and create IP before a lengthy innovation and development process is finished?
How to cope with the avalanche of competitive IP? Where and what to look for?
Advise on how to admin and set-up the internal IP organization.
And the big question: where to focus IP which is intended to protect the (unknown?) future?

